The intersection of technology and leadership

Category: Learning (Page 15 of 15)

Asking for Feedback Today

At Thoughtworks we run regular rounds of reviews (at least twice a year). We also try to collect project roll off reviews although collecting feedback at these points sometimes proves difficult as people move on to other projects. The last few rounds, I’ve used the list that Jason Yip wrote a while back here. It’s served me well on the most part, and thought it’s about time to review them to be slightly more relevant. Here’s the latest one I’m using for my current project.

  • How do you feel about how I’ve listened to you? Tried to understand you?
  • Did I provide you with enough guidance and support? Did I give you enough freedom? How would you describe my approach?
  • What things made it easy for you to work/pair program with me? What things made it hard to work/pair program with me? How do you think we could collaborate better?
  • In the role of a technical lead, do you think I was effective or ineffective? How could I become more effective in my role? What do you see as my greatest strengths? What do you see as my greatest weaknesses?
  • Describe how my style differs from other technical leads that you’ve worked with? What would you change? What would you keep?
  • What things have I done that have had a significant impact (positive and negative) on the project?
  • What areas do you think I can improve or grow in and why?

I’d be interested to see if you have any more that you ask yourself? If so, please leave a comment.

Onboarding Strategy: Big Vision Business Problem

Walking Over London

Photo taken from Sean Stayte’s photostream under Creative Commons.

Its Purpose?
Big Vision Business Problem helps team members form a common understanding of the problem they are trying to solve. It introduces them to a number of high level domain concepts and puts the work they will do into an overall context. The Big Vision Business Problem must be driven by a real Business Need.

How Did We Execute It?
The entire team sat down at the start of the project, and using a whiteboard, we started drawing people (represented as stick figures), systems (as boxes) and talked through a number of workflows. We incorporated both technical and non technical systems as we talked about the needs of the users, how the system satisfies or doesn’t satisfy those needs and how they interact. We kept mainly to the main “happy flow” or the “common walkflow” through the system because it is such a big system.

Techniques Found Useful For Running It

  • Personas – We leverage personas a great deal during requirements gathering, and found this same technique helps new people grasp with the system for many of the same reasons. Giving a name to a person playing a role in the overall business problem is much easier to understand than simply labelling them with that role.
  • Physical Diagrams – Talking over a set of boxes at a high level and seeing the users interact with each box helps give context to what is really going on.
  • Whiteboard – Nice big diagrams are great, but simple lo-fi diagrams that you can edit in response to people’s questions and around discussions is much easier

Why Is It Important?
Putting people’s work into context is important for me, and by talking over the business problem as a team, helps people understand what it is they are contributing to. Technical solutions may seem strange and may appear clearer if people understand the business constraints. It also allows people to offer alternative solutions that might be more practical and less costly. I can imagine that if you are having difficulty expressing the business problem, perhaps there is no problem, or it needs to be simplified or clarified as people focus their energies on work that may not contribute to solving the same overall problem.

Next Time I Might Try:

  • Taking and Showing Photos – Could be quite useful for showing people using the system
  • Drawing a Timeline – Doing a simple walkthrough over a well spaced out timeline to discuss stages of an older system, and what the business would like to achieve in the future.

An Introduction to Project Onboarding Strategies

In the last month and a bit, I’ve been heads down starting with a new team on another release of an old project I worked on last year. Onboarding new members to a team or to a project is important to me – namely because I’ve been in positions where if it’s not done right makes people a less effective team member. Tight schedules and the overall lack of domain knowledge in new team members meant that successful or unsuccessful onboarding a huge influence on overall project success.

Perhaps it’s my emphasis on coaching, learning and sharing that means that my interest naturally gravitates towards onboarding activities. Just like well-run company inductions help new employees in their overall position, I feel project onboarding is important for setting the scene, establishing the role and efforts of new members. The last thing I wanted was for a bunch of really enthusiastic people to be pulling in separate directions. After talking with some people at the pub, I realised that the techniques I applied aren’t naturally that apparent to people, so I thought I’d write up about them, how we used them, how unsuccessful or unsuccessful they were and then what I’d change about them. In a way, these patterns are a combination of learning/teaching patterns that might be useful to someone (if so, I’d really like to know and please leave a comment!)

I’ll continue to categorise/tag each of these as “Onboarding Strategy” so it’s easy to find. Read on for the first one here.

Knowledge Management Tips

Everyone has their own style of keeping on top of things and a former workmate told me about the way one of his team members organised his information that I thought might be useful for people. I haven’t given it a go yet but I should definitely try it out.

  1. Everything that he thought useful, he would write in a small text file and save it away.
  2. Using google desktop, he could search for the information whenever he needed it.

Listening to yourself for feedback

Having new people join the team always brings great insight, even if they are kind enough to come onto the project not firing criticisms immediately. When introducing them to a new codebase, I find it’s important to listen for yourself as you’re showing them for key phrases such as ideally we would have, I’m not particularly proud of, I have no idea why this is here, or this is a work-around.

Circumstances change and constraints in the past may no longer apply. All of this means you can continue to refactor the codebase to be clearer and easier to maintain. It may not mean you can fix things straight away but at least you know which parts you can improve on.

Current Reflections on the 2007 Retrospective Facilitators Gathering

So it’s at the end of the second day that I’m writing about my experiences at the Retrospective Gathering. I hope that this entry not only helps me to distil my thoughts, realisations, affirmations and respect for different opinions but I hope it helps other people understand what retrospectives are, how important they can be and why there is an entire conference dedicated to it.

I’ve attended and participated in several conferences in the past, and the gathering I’ve been part of two days so far feels very different to others I’ve attended. Perhaps part of it has to do with the size (26 or so people), or perhaps it has to do with a group of people sharing a common passion helping each other to learn and grow. Either way, I feel it doesn’t matter that you’ve published (or not published) any books, it doesn’t matter the number of times that you’ve attended, and it doesn’t matter how you choose to participate, as it feels like a safe environment to share experiences and push each other’s learning comfort zone.

We are running this particular gathering using open space rules and despite the small number of participants we get quite a few different streams of so many different topics. I will post a link to the area where we are currently collating results.

Thinking Toys at the Retrospective Gathering

For me, even after only the second day, it has be a phenomenal learning experience. Despite everyone’s passions for the same thing, I’m fascinated how so many people found the role of retrospective facilitation through so many different paths. I think I’ve already come away with plenty of learnings that I will try to distil (so far) in the list below:

  • Training and coaching other retrospective facilitators actually requires lots of thought and preparation – sometimes people aren’t or will never be completely suitable for running them but it doesn’t mean they can’t contribute to a valuable session with other facilitators.
  • Despite my passion for the topics, I don’t think I’ve personally spent enough time promoting or encouraging retrospectives (or what I prefer to classify as continuous improvement at a company, team or individual level) in my company enough and I definitely will try more to when I get back.
  • I learned a heck a lot more about Temperature Readings and I think I’ve addressed a lot of my fears and concerns about not using it inappropriately.
  • Facilitating distributed retrospectives brings about a whole heap of its own obstacles and it’s good to have contributed to developing a toolkit for dealing with it.
  • Gut feel plays an important part of the way facilitators seem to make decisions – though best practices may exist, judgement about when things are used and not used is more important than sticking to “best practices”.

There’s some really interesting resources I’ve accumulated so far, and at the end I will certainly ensure the list is put in one place, but here’s some of the items I’ve got to look into right now:

  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • Non Violent Communication
  • The Elegant solution
  • Innovation Games
  • Corporate Cultural Survival Group
  • Managing at the speed of Change
  • Naming the Elephant
  • Focused Questions
  • New People Making
  • Fearless Change

As always if you have managed to get this far, I would enjoy hearing your feedback, thoughts, opinions and questions on anything I’ve written about so far.

Starting from Principles

Starting new projects always carries great responsibility but also offers a great opportunity to improve it by applying learnings from previous projects. Fortunately I’m currently in this position as one of the early developers on a greenfields project that’s been running for the last two weeks.

What I’m attempting to do this time is that instead of defining and/or enforcing a set of coding standards and patterns used throughout the project, I’m hoping to capture the thinking that goes along side the decisions as we make them, distilling them into a set of core principles we’re striving for. By capturing these core principles I hope it makes it easier for new people to come on board, provide a better context for analysing the code artefacts we create and still leaves an open discussion for newcomers to suggest better ways of achieving these same principles.

Newer posts »

© 2024 patkua@work

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑