I realised that most (ok, all) of my reading of late has been entirely non-fiction (and probably excessively IT related) so I thought I should get back to the fictional genre. Since I was in the city on Monday just gone, I dropped into the library and, for no other reason except that the blurb read well, picked up a copy of The Parrot’s Theorem written by Denis Guedj (and translated from French by Frank Wynne).
Anyone who knows me I’m not too fond of studying mathematics, but for some reason, this book, classified as Math Fiction, seemed to catch my eye. This French best seller’s is set in a Parisian bookstore, detailing the story of a mysterious cargo shipment of a Mathematical library, a talking Amazon blue parrot and somehow managing to form a link between the rest of these as well as the mafia and the death of the bookstore owner’s long lost army friend. After finishing the book last night, I would not be inclined to say that this book’s bizarre and intertwining plotline was definitely not its strongest point. As funny as this may sound, the plotline simply set the stage for the author to describe (what I hope to actually be factual) the history and evolution of over 2000 years of mathematical theorem’s and proofs.
Unlike the maths classes that I remember, that simply detailed formulas and repetitive rehearsals, this book gave life to a number of world famous mathematicians and the circumstances in which they developed their theorems. I had no idea, for example, that mathematics (a simple definition of a link between a theory and a proof involving numbers) was really the result of a number of philosophical arguments and there continues to be a strong relationship between mathematics and philosophy today. Most of the famous ancient mathematicians were fore mostly philosophers, and then followed by their role as mathematicians. The author continues to demonstrate that modern day fundamentals are in fact, only fairly modern. He discusses the concept of zero and how it was only invented in 733AD (that’s 1272 years ago) even though mathematics has been around almost double that time.
The biggest thing that this book has to offer is not really the education of the number of theorems it covers, but the really interesting way that they came into being.
TheKua Rating: Fictional value (6 out of 10), Educational value (9 out of 10).
Sounds worth checking out. In my area of Statistics, there is a fairly controversial debate about the philisophical implications of statistical inference (especially Bayesian-style “inverse probability”). Statistics is often considered not a real branch of mathematics, because no matter how confident you are about a statement, you can always be wrong. Terry Pratchett’s saying “1,000,000 to 1 chances crop up 9 times out of 10” is an amusing way of saying that a specific observation won’t necessarily reflect the expected likelihood. Sometimes, people just “get lucky” …
I’ve just finished reading Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle (Quicksilver, The Confusion, The System of the World). It is another work of historical fiction that deals with the history of mathematics (specifically, the arguments between Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz about the invention of calculus). However, the emphasis of this series is more on the fictional plot than on explaining the mathematical and scientific theories. Still, it makes a damn good read 🙂
If you are game for something much heavier, I would recommend the non-fiction work Logic, Language & Meaning in two volumes. It was my logic textbook in undergrad, but I found its discussion of the interdisciplinary overlap between logic, linguistics and philosophy to be very interesting.
Thanks Matt. I’ll have to add them to the reading list.
Also on the topic of the relationship between philosophy and science, Tyson recommends Bryan Magee’s book on Karl Popper.